case law explanation Things To Know Before You Buy
case law explanation Things To Know Before You Buy
Blog Article
However, the above observation is without prejudice on the legal rights of the parties, arising out of the over marriage of the pair, if any, pending before the competent court of legislation. Read more
Official database for searching and viewing federal court dockets and case documents. Compact fees use.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have listened to the learned counsel for that parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments because the issues of your matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard for the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(one) in the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession in the subjected premises into the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs for being decided via the competent court after hearing the parties if pending since the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer within the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court must see this factor for interim custody of the topic premises In case the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
This ruling has conditions, and For the reason that petitioners unsuccessful a qualifying Test, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based about the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances of your case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 of your Constitution. Read more
Therefore, this petition is found for being not maintainable and is particularly dismissed along with the pending application(s), along with the petitioners may perhaps seek out remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
Civil Courts keep jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it needs legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be generated and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more
When the state court hearing the case reviews the regulation, he finds that, when it mentions large multi-tenant properties in certain context, it's actually very imprecise about whether the 90-working day provision relates to all landlords. The judge, based around the specific circumstances of Stacy’s case, decides that all landlords are held on the ninety-day notice prerequisite, and rules in Stacy’s favor.
The court system is then tasked with interpreting the legislation when it is actually unclear how it relates to any offered situation, generally rendering judgments based around the intent of lawmakers as well as circumstances with the case at hand. These decisions become a guide for long term similar cases.
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming into the main case, It is usually a nicely-set up proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is topic to the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings around the evidence.
Article 199 on the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other sufficient remedy is provided by law." It truly is nicely-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust readily available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether All those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Federalism also plays a major role in determining the authority of case legislation within a particular court. Indeed, Just about every circuit has its very own set of binding case legislation. Because of this, a judgment rendered within the Ninth Circuit will not be binding during the Second Circuit but will have persuasive authority.
A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar challenge. When they sue their landlord, the court must utilize the previous court’s decision in making use of the law. This example of case regulation refers to 2 cases read within the state court, for the same level.
17 . Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI forty six I have read the uncovered counsel to the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments since the issues from the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard into the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(1) of the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession with the subjected premises to the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to become decided via the competent court after hearing the parties if pending given that the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer from the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has to see this component for interim custody of the topic premises In case the petitioner was check here found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order. Read more
Criminal cases Inside the common regulation tradition, courts decide the legislation applicable to your case by interpreting statutes and applying precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. As opposed to most civil legislation systems, common regulation systems follow the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their very own previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all decreased courts should make decisions consistent with the previous decisions of higher courts.